2015 Data
Location: 107 Burton Main Road
|
Min
|
Max
|
Average
|
Relative Humidity (%)
|
16.9
|
100
|
82
|
Solar Radiation (Watts/m2)
|
0.6
|
1119
|
284
|
Wind Speed (m/s)
|
0.0
|
4.03
|
1.2
|
Wind Gust (m/s)
|
0.0
|
14.9
|
4.5
|
Leaf Wetness (%)
|
0.0
|
100
|
54
|
As a comparison, 2014 data is below
2014 Data
Location: 107 Burton Main Road
|
Min
|
Max
|
Average
|
Relative Humidity (%)
|
20.3
|
100
|
83
|
Solar Radiation (Watts/m2)
|
23
|
1171
|
514
|
Wind Speed (m/s)
|
0.0
|
2.27
|
0.9
|
Wind Gusts (m/s)
|
0.0
|
12.09
|
4.0
|
Leaf Wetness (%)
|
0.0
|
100
|
35
|
So what do we take from this? We had a pretty hot and dry year and our Leaf Wetness (dew point essentially) increased because of this. Why? Our RH is about the same as 2014, so that means the dew point is pretty close the actual temperature (at 100% RH the dew point and temperature are the same and looking at individual data points we had many many days at 100% RH). In a nutshell, even in hot dry weather our vines are getting wet - leading to all the wonderful mildew problems.
The real take-away is how important it is too keep our vines tied up, our canopy nicely pruned and the excess leaves pulled to allow the breeze to aid in keeping things dry. As we learnt last year, even a diligent spray program fails if the vine management is not kept up.
Solar Radiation? I would have expected it to increase. I thought I was starting to understand just a little bit about what solar radiation is, but not really sure why our overall average would be less, when our season was really quite warm on a day to day basis. Any smart climate folks out there able to explain?? I blame the darn wasps!
Looking forward to a new growing season. Pruning work bee coming up Sunday March 6 at 9AM. Stay tuned!
Dense smoke covered the area during what should of been the hottest, sunniest days of summer.
ReplyDeleteGreat post on the RH vs. Fungal pressure!
ReplyDeleteGreat post on the RH vs. Fungal pressure!
ReplyDeleteYes, never thought of the smoke, it could have impacted the solar radiation results
ReplyDeleteMight be an idea to publish this info in the BC grapegrowers research section. Might provide us with more input
ReplyDelete